Latest Posts
Converting customers into advocates
January 17, 2012 (comments: 0)
A few weeks ago I was having lunch with a banker friend from a top Malaysian institution. I asked him what he believed to be the most effective form of promotion for a bank. Without hesitation he said customer advocacy. Although that was what I was thinking—I did not expect this to be his first answer. I am not sure why I was surprised, after all, a recommendation from someone we trust is the way most of us prefer to make any vendor choice. When we are faced with two or more options we feel safer following in the footsteps of a friend or a peer who has had a positive experience. It just struck me as an uncharacteristic answer coming from a banker because the traditional bank marketing approach relies heavily on mass communication through traditional advertising mediums. One-to-many communication doesn’t go far in cultivating advocates.
So what does? Focusing organizational resources (personnel and infrastructure) to:
- Consistently deliver exceptional quality products – that are personalized, relevant, intelligent
- Consistently provide exceptional quality service – know your customer
- Consistently create exceptional experiences on all channels – especially the channel of each customer’s choice
- Build a marketplace reputation for consistently providing a WOW experience – exceed customer expectations
There’s clearly a theme here—consistency. When customers can rely on the fact that they will get responsive, personalized service every time they interact with your bank, and that you are offering them products that will make their lives easier as well as help them to meet their financial objectives, loyalty will follow. The act of providing them with offers and service that enhance their positive feelings about your products will “convert” customers into advocates or ambassadors for the institution.
It’s the message not the medium!
October 11, 2011 (comments: 0)
Here we go again…introducing more new channels for delivering financial transactions to our existing customers/members. Will this just be one more way to check account balances?
It seems that every five years or so banks and credit unions fall all over themselves in an effort to stay competitive by introducing the latest and greatest channel technology. Why?
Number one reason—because everyone else is doing it. While new technology usually offers some advantages to the customer or the institution, functionality all too often, remains business as usual. The medium is new, but it’s the same old message.
This time it should be different, it’s time for a change in the game. This time when we jump into mobile banking solutions, social media strategies or Web 2.0 initiatives, we should stop and remember it’s about the message not just one more way to check account balances or to deliver a “special offer” that may not even be relevant to the customer.
This time, when we introduce a new channel technology, it should be unified with most, if not all, existing channel technologies, and the channel applications should share data while executing a single corporate strategy for delivering consistent messages across all channels—not just the latest. By integrating channel applications, you will be able to unify the message and the personalized marketing efforts with the relationship and service efforts of your front-line, whether it is through a service rep or a self-service channel option. Optimizing all channel investments through unification should be the goal, not simply introducing new channels to appeal to segments of your customer/member base.
This time the plans and the strategies need to focus first on the message then on the medium. Who we are trying to reach and for what purpose needs to be unified with other organizational marketing and relationship building efforts.
Mobile, social media and Web 2.0 technologies offer a world of possibilities, but to take advantage of them (in a profitable way) requires a business strategy and an organizational structure that allows the customer to select the channel of their choice. The message should remain consistent whether it is a transaction, a personal service follow-up, intelligent and relevant marketing outreach or a relationship building contact. Being able to consistently deliver (regardless of channel) is the real game changer.
It’s all about consistency…
September 19, 2011 (comments: 0)
Likely, many of you are now offering up to five different ways for customers/members to obtain their account balances. Yet amazingly, for most institutions, balance inquiry is still the #1 transaction for call center agents and it still ranks high as a primary reason for many branch visits.
Why is this? Why aren’t consumers taking greater advantage of self-service options? I believe that they have the perception that it is easier, and they are more likely to get accurate information, if they speak with a live representative.
Is this an accurate view of your organization’s delivery channels? Do channels exist in their own silos of data and processes?
Whether this perception is accurate, or not, I believe the key to changing perceptions is consistency. Consistency in the content of a response and consistency in the delivery of information builds confidence in your institution in the eyes of customers/members and your staff (yes, your staff); and, we all know that confidence and trust is the foundation of any good relationship.
So, how do you achieve consistency? One, employ a single “system of record” approach to organizing data. If there is only one data source used by all channels – self-service as well as live agents – then the information will truly be consistent across the enterprise. When staff can count on the fact that they can easily pull up accurate, up-to-date information (customer/member and product data, transaction histories, etc.) from your system every time they assist a customer/member, they are confident in the service they provide—and that confidence will then be conveyed to consumers. Not to mention, training staff to use a single system of record is significantly faster and easier.
Two, establish a single process flow for the delivery of information. Regardless of channel, a single process flow can be designed and executed which always moves the interaction through a predefined set of steps—this results in a sense of familiarity and comfort with how the information is retrieved and delivered. For example:
Step 1. Customer/member is greeted in a personalized way
Step 2. Customer/member is always identified
Step 3. The reason for the interaction is determined (How can we help you?). And so forth, through fulfillment or determining the next steps that will bring a satisfying close.
Consistency builds comfort and confidence. We all feel better when our expectations are based on experience—and delivering great customer experiences is the name of the game.
Part II: It’s Time to Engage Your Tellers in Sales
July 22, 2011 (comments: 0)
Coaching to the “I’m just a teller” attitude
As I am sure you know all too well, some people are more willing and able to engage in selling than others, so there will always be a few people who just can’t get there. At the same time, there will be a few tellers who are naturals. For the rest, we need to help them adapt to a changing role for tellers in the delivery of sales and service. I do not have any magic words to coach the reluctant, but I do have an opinion on how to maximize the overall performance of the teller team.
I believe there are two key factors that need to be addressed early on. First is fear; many tellers are just plain scared of engaging the member/customer. They are afraid of not knowing what to say to begin the conversation, afraid of not knowing what to say if the member does want to talk about a product offer and afraid of annoying the member if they are not interested at all.
The second factor is motivation. Tellers are busy most of the day. Adding the steps of presenting offers and capturing leads increases their workload—so it’s all about giving them the right motivation to take those activities on. I recently visited a credit union branch where tellers were engaged in lead generation. One teller generated about 90 referrals in a week. Phenomenal! The closest teller did about half that many. When questioned on what motivated her, she said she liked being recognized as the top performer. She was motivated by the recognition of her peers and her managers. Her enthusiasm yielded the additional benefit of motivating her peers to do better. Working as part of a team where everyone’s contribution is tracked and recognized is a powerful message all by itself. Recognition is always the #1 motivator as revealed in industry surveys (even over money).
I have heard it said that all emotions stem from two—love and fear. So, how can we help tellers to stop fearing sales activities and put them on a path to loving their success, if not the activities themselves? I believe the uncertainties that underlie their fears can be eliminated or at least dramatically reduced by taking a few key steps.
1. The organization should make certain that the offers being made to members have real value. When the teller feels comfortable that the offer really is good for the member, then they are more comfortable delivering the message. If the teller needs coaching to understand the value that is ok.
2. Knowing that the answers to most potential member questions are at their fingertips will also eliminate a lot of anxiety. Even though tellers receive product training, creating scripts or “cheat sheets” with key details provides support for tellers who are just getting started and gives them a safety net in the early going. Knowing that you are there to catch them if they fall may be just enough motivation to take the next steps.
Coaching is always challenging, but it’s easier when the basics are in place to move the team forward.
Capturing leads: Does it take a natural sales person, the right technology or the right motivation?
May 23, 2011 (comments: 1)
Last week, I accompanied a bank who is evaluating our unified Sales Management system on a visit to our largest credit union client. We met at one of the busiest branches and were hosted by the branch manager and her team—who did a phenomenal job of presenting the system. While looking at performance dashboards, the banker noticed that one of the CU’s tellers had generated a huge number of leads (capturing approximately 90 referrals in one week), significantly more than any of her colleagues.
In the ensuing discussion, it was explained that this teller just loves to talk with members, and that with the new system, capturing leads for new products is so easy that she can do it with little extra effort and as part of the natural flow of conversation. Everyone else in the branch is watching this person’s performance and they are all motivated to achieve record results themselves. At this point, there is a very little financial reward involved. The reward is personal satisfaction and recognition by her peers and management.
I left with three thoughts about this experience.
1. Maybe there are natural born sales people, but everyone benefits from being part of an enthusiastic team
2. Recognition is always first on the list of sales motivators, with money showing up further down the list.
3. Financial institutions who want to not only survive, but also thrive in this market better equip their team members to compete.
One-to-One Marketing: If you could, would you?
May 4, 2011 (comments: 0)
The concept of one-to-one marketing has been described and predicted for nearly 30 years. The idea being that as databases, containing information on prospects’ needs, habits, likes and dislikes, continue to grow, retailers should be using this data to fashion highly personalized offers.
While many of the major retailers have made good strides, main stream success has remained elusive—especially for financial institutions. Most continue to seek a fool-proof way to automate the process of zeroing in on the “next best product” to offer their customers.
As a result, millions of dollars are being spent annually to gather and mine data on existing customers in hopes of identifying “cross-selling” opportunities based on “calculated” needs.
MCIF approach misses the mark
Today, the focus of much of these mining efforts is to create ”campaigns” where offers are made through a range of media (i.e. newspapers, billboards, radio, TV and the Web); and, groups of customers or prospects in a geographical area are targeted for a specific product.
To launch and manage these marketing campaigns institutions invest in MCIF technology as a basic way to provide a structure for managing (one size fits all) campaign activities. But, this approach is outdated, and a poor use of limited corporate resources. This is especially true as channel investments continue at a rapid pace with a second generation of internet banking, mobile banking and the use of social media; not to mention the sales training investments for branch and call center staff over the past 5 years.
Enable front-line staff to close business
The opportunity exists right now to change this practice. It’s time to stop launching global campaigns and instead, fashion personalized offers that are delivered to customers and prospects through your existing channels. Don’t make any more expensive media placements! Enable your frontline staff to deliver offers and close business on the spot or effortlessly (automatically) refer customers to an appropriate representative for closure.
How? It’s all about the unification of delivery channels…because unification allows for true integration of your sales and marketing programs and the ability to learn more about the customer, directly from the customer! Beginning with the earliest new account activity and building with “on-boarding” campaigns and subsequent interactions with the customer, you can capture insights into their real-life needs and product interests—rather than “calculated” values essentially spit out by an MCIF system.
Reel customers in via their channel(s) of choice
Just imagine…your front-line staff and self-service channels can actually ask a customer about their needs, lifestyle factors and interests and then log this information into a centralized contact history database. In this scenario, the customer’s channel of choice also becomes part of the equation where you can interact with them when and how it best suits them—whether in a branch, on the phone, through the web or via mobile device.
Which came first—the chicken or the egg?
July 23, 2010 (comments: 0)
In the case of Customer Relationship Management (CRM) and Customer Experience Management (CEM) the answer is clear-CEM, or the proverbial chicken.
CEM is based on the premise that exceeding your customers' service expectations while creating a satisfying experience with each and every interaction is crucial to developing loyal relationships. By its very name, CRM assumes that there is a relationship already in place to manage. Case closed.
Developing customer relationships is both an art and a science. And without question, it is an ongoing process. It is my belief that CRM strategies and technology aim to build on what you know (or data you can purchase) about a customer, while CEM strategies and systems build on what the customer knows and feels about you.
Building on the customer's positive perception of your organization and your ability to meet and exceed his/her needs has been the focus of some of the world's most successful retailers. Themes such as "the customer is always right" have led service and sales teams to establish powerful brand loyalty. But I have never heard of a motivational quote such as "we know more about you than you do" leading to a retail bonanza.
Delivering exceptional service, taking that extra step, will open the door to cross- selling opportunities and position your organization to expand customer product relationships.
Regardless of the investments you have already made in CRM technology or the plans that you have for developing customer relationships, go back and look closely at how your organization is handling customer interactions at each touch-point. Would you be wowed? And, don't overlook self-service channels because expanding self-service usage offers your organization the greatest opportunity for cost savings.
As you well know from your own life experience, how you feel about a retailer is a result of how they present themselves to you and how efficiently they handle interactions whether it is face-to-face, over the phone or on the Web.
Making the Business Case for Unifying All Channels Part III: Control Technology Overhead
May 18, 2010 (comments: 0)
For the past 30 years there has been an almost continual shift in the ways that customers interact with their financial institutions-and to a large extent, this has been driven by technology innovation. From online branch systems and ATMs, to telephone and internet banking, the change has been constant and will inevitably continue.
Customers have come to expect that their financial institution will provide access to their accounts from any and all channel technologies and not just for inquiries, but real-time transactions too. The competitive nature of the financial services industry necessitates that community institutions meet these expectations in the same ways that large multi-national banks do.
The problem is that this has driven community institutions to make massive investments in channel technologies, as they have appeared in the market-with little regard for existing channel implementations. Consequently, silos of customer data have been created, disparate technology architectures are not "playing well" together, and system complexity is requiring that institutions add IT staff. So what can be done?
Establish a single technology architecture that makes technical support and system integration much less challenging. And, the good news is that this doesn't have to be daunting. The technology advances of the past several years make it possible today to create your own company standard (selecting the applications and infrastructure that will be used uniformly across the enterprise-SQL Server, Oracle, Linux, etc.). Therefore, for example, if you are going to standardize on Linux, apply that to application selection as you upgrade existing channel technology or choose a new vendor.
You can also reduce information silos by establishing "systems of record." Rather than maintaining redundant data in various applications, a single system/application can become the "official" source of certain information. For example, rates can be entered and maintained in one location instead of via multiple files, thereby streamlining processes and eliminating the risk of inconsistency between channel applications. Another good example is using a CIF for customer/member data rather than multiple account files.
Perhaps the biggest savings opportunity offered by standardizing your channel technology is to reduce the number and variety of technical skills required within your IT organization. Not only do you save by the range of skills, but you make it far more straight forward for the current team to address support and enhancement requests. In a competitive market, having the ability to embrace change and easily apply new technology capabilities to a uniform infrastructure gives you an advantage that can make a big difference to your customers and to your bottom-line.
Making the Business Case for Unifying All Channels Part II: Efficiently & Profitably Process Volumes of Business
May 4, 2010 (comments: 0)
Have you ever wondered how many resources your bank is wasting by supporting a hodge podge of customer interaction channels with disparate databases and different application software? And, what kind of experience is this creating for your customers? Consider this. Why is it that your customers wait in line to use expensive channels at the branch to get balance information that's readily available on the Web, ATM, or via IVR? Is it that they don't trust those sources, or are they uncomfortable with inconsistencies in the user interfaces? How many times must a customer contact your organization to get an issue resolved, and do they have to repeatedly explain their problem in the process? What this all boils down to is that there is a very definite cost to NOT unifying your channels.
A multi-channel strategy for interacting with your customers offers a substantial payback in hard operating costs, such as eliminating redundant system technologies and the support costs for multiple interfaces to the same data. But perhaps more importantly, it creates value by enhancing your customer's experience at each interaction. Here are a few things to think about when you are ready to begin eliminating silos and achieving consistency across the enterprise.
Access to all information real-time is paramount
You must start by defining the experience that you want to provide your customers, and then work back from there, keeping in mind that the self-service channels are most profitable. So, what can you do to make the self-service channels more attractive? For one, give customers fast access to their most up to date information. Two, approach self-service channels as a vehicle for enhancing the relationship (which leads to the next key element)...
Make self-service personal & relevant
It's about making each channel totally user-focused; this is essential to being able to optimize channel usage by customer and maximize the return on your investments in self-service channels. Invest in the user interface to make it as friendly and intuitive as possible. Track customer usage and record any service issues or product interests to bring these back into subsequent interactions. The inclusion of personalized information makes self-service meaningful and valuable to the customer. Over time, your best customers can be rewarded for using self-service (special offers, additional benefits, etc.), while the customers whose relationship offers no profitability can be assessed fees for using anything other than self service channels.
Automate the workflow process
Finally, you must standardize the process workflow across channels; this will not only help bring consistency to the customer experience, but it will also aid in eliminating waste and inefficiencies within your channel investments. The interface and the workflow process should follow a single set of standards for sequence, the use of color, terminology and more; this will help the customer quickly find their way to the information or transactions that they need. Remember though that user acceptance is key, especially with self-service channels. Acceptance is most closely tied to accessibility of information, ease of navigation, and trust in the accuracy of the process.
The ultimate payoff
While unifying your delivery channels will cut operating costs, streamline processes and remove technology redundancies, the ultimate payoff is what you'll gain from providing a superior customer experience. In integrating your channels, you achieve consistency in the way you serve customers, but you also set a common goal throughout the enterprise, weaving exceptional service into the everyday fabric of how everyone at the institution interacts with customers. And, exceptional service equals profitable, long-term customer/member relationships.
Making the Business Case for Unifying Channels Part I: Making the Customer’s Channel of Choice the Right One for You
April 6, 2010 (comments: 0)
It used to be that the branch was the customer's channel of choice-and actually, not long ago, the only channel. During the past 30+ years, many channels have evolved with the objective of improving service, or at least improving the availability of service for customers/members. And, just when you thought that the number and types of channels might have stabilized with the Web, along comes social media, mobile banking and even customer interaction options that are variations of these many channels. The good news is that with the introduction of multiple delivery channels, interaction volumes have grown, but there's bad news too. Most institutions will find that the growth has not necessarily been in ways that are most profitable for them.
Without stating every challenge that is presented by hosting and supporting four, five, six or more channels, suffice it to say that while the types of channels have multiplied by five, the number of customers at most institutions have not. At the same time, customers you hoped would use the lower cost, self-service channels often do not, while the people you would like to see in the branch in hopes of doing some cross selling, prefer the web.
What is going on? Well, people choose channels based on their own preferences, lifestyles, or maybe life stages. I recently heard a statistic that 70% of people looking for a financial product today conduct their search on the Internet. Yet, 50% choose an institution based on convenient, local branch locations. (I'd still like to know where there are convenient ATMs.)
The competitive reality is that most, if not all, banking channels need to be supported well if an institution hopes to attract and retain the best customer relationships. The key is to excel in usability across all channels and do so profitably. Here's how.
You must find a balance in channel investments as a whole vs. individually, and to teach your customers to love the channel that provides the specific service they need at the best cost (to you). For example, account balance inquiries have always been one of the first functions offered as new channels have been introduced; now the cost can vary from several dollars in a branch, to pennies on the Web. And, let's face it oftentimes it's your least profitable customers that queue up in the branches to obtain their balances.
The way to begin to remedy this? Unify your channels. This will give you the ability to consolidate customer information, improve the availability of service and enable you to start a transaction in one channel, but complete it in another-this is crucial today if your institution is to remain competitive. You must also be able to make special offers and set up new accounts without requiring customers to visit the branch; then in the case of my example, you can also begin to migrate customers simply seeking their account balances to a more cost-effective channel for the bank.
The fact is that unifying channels is not, and does not have to be, as painful as you think; it is a technical reality today vs. simply a promise of recent years past-and there are affordable options. It's time to optimize your existing channels so that you can serve customers well with each interaction, while lowering your operating costs across the board. By achieving a unified enterprise, you will also be prepared to easily integrate any new interaction options that your customers demand in coming years.
By connecting all the dots and eliminating silos of information you can appeal to the customer's needs with each interaction and when possible, drive them to lower cost channels. At the same time, on the self-service channels, you can further cultivate the relationship with special offers and incentives that get them in front of your customer service representatives; ultimately, enabling your institution to gain a greater return on its brick and mortar investment. In the end, it's about putting in place an infrastructure that enables your institution to make all of your customers' preferred channels profitable for you.

